Yvette Cooper has announced that MPs will look into how social media companies can censor a “tide of hate”, and strongly implied that freedom of speech should mean freedom from criticism in remarks ahead of a new inquiry into “hate crime”.
And who will define “hate speech”? Yvette Cooper? The police?
When does her definition of “hate” overlap free speech? When someone gets their feelings hurt? Who decides when feelings are hurt?
This woman is a Labour MP, a party formed to protect and improve the lives of working class people along with trade unions.
Both have deviated so far from the original the founders of these movements would not recognise them.
They want to ban anything or anyone that opposes their liberal fascist views – they want to put an end to people speaking out against what is basically the tyrannical mindset of liberal/left ideology.
This is pathetic desperation from a declining and haemorrhaging ideology. The Cultural-Marxist agenda cannot survive with free and open discussion.
If the truth can flow freely about the realities of gender, religion, race, lifestyles, Etc. today’s Neo-Communist agenda would be crushed, so the suppression of reality must continue.
What they want is Orwellian censorship on free speech.
The only person who wants that sort of censorship on free speech is the intellectually insecure – those who have no confidence in their ability to either defend their own views, or to successfully traduce those of their opponent.
What Yvette Cooper really means is enforcing political correctness which is just another word for thought control. When politicians start telling the population what they can and cannot say, it is a short step to fascism.
|Juno for your news|
|You cannot trust the mainstream media|